ESA Rule Change May End Habitat Protection

Govind Tekale

Trump administration aims to strip crucial habitat protections from endangered wildlife by changing what "harm" means under the law.

Photo Source: Gage Skidmore (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Representative Image

The proposed rule would only protect species from direct killing or injury, not from destruction of forests, wetlands, and other places they need to survive.

Photo Source: Timon Cornelissen (Pexels)

Representative Image

Habitat loss drives most endangered species toward extinction, making this rule change particularly threatening to wildlife recovery efforts.

Photo Source: konjure (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Representative Image

What they're proposing will fundamentally upend how we've been protecting endangered species in this country," warns Noah Greenwald from the Center for Biological Diversity.

Photo Source: Jeffrey Beall (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Representative Image

Energy industry supporters claim the current habitat rules block development projects that wouldn't actually hurt wildlife.

Photo Source: Tayssir Kadamany (Pexels)

Representative Image

The Supreme Court previously upheld habitat protections in 1995, ruling that indirect harm through habitat destruction was covered under the Endangered Species Act.

Photo Source: Joe Ravi (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Representative Image

Northern spotted owls, red-legged frogs, and countless other species could lose critical safeguards if timber companies can log their habitats without restrictions.

Photo Source: Sounds Wild (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Representative Image

Environmental groups have already promised to fight the changes in court, calling it "a knife through the heart" of wildlife protection.

Photo Source: AZZJJ (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Representative Image

The public has 30 days to comment on the proposed changes before they potentially become final regulations.

Photo Source: Eren Li (Pexels)

Representative Image