Endangered Species Act Faces Major Habitat Rule Shift

Govind Tekale

Trump administration has begun redefining what "harm" means for endangered species, potentially weakening critical habitat protections that safeguard wildlife.

Photo Source: Gage Skidmore (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The Interior Department's proposed rule, now under review, could strip protections from plants and animals facing extinction by changing decades-old standards.

Photo Source: Hans Gerwitz (Pexels)

Weakening the definition of harm would cut the heart out of the Endangered Species Act," warns Noah Greenwald from the Center for Biological Diversity.

Photo Source: Papahānaumoku (PDM 1.0)

Habitat destruction stands as the primary threat to endangered species, making the legal definition of "harm" crucial for protecting wildlife from developers and industries.

Photo Source: Giftzwerg 88 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Additional rollbacks being considered include limiting critical habitat designations and requiring economic impact assessments before listing endangered species.

Photo Source: Nothing Ahead (Pexels)

Conservation groups prepare for legal battles as courts will ultimately decide what changes to the ESA are permissible under law.

Photo Source: Kaboompics.com (Pexels)

Scientists sound the alarm that over one million species worldwide face extinction in coming decades if habitat protections continue to erode.

Photo Source: Dave Shea (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The changes align with "Project 2025," a conservative policy blueprint that prioritizes reducing environmental regulations in favor of economic interests.

Photo Source: Yan Krukau (Pexels)