Legal Battle Over Endangered Species Act Protections Escalates

Rahul Somvanshi

The Center for Biological Diversity has stepped into a high-stakes legal battle to defend threatened wildlife from losing vital protections under the Endangered Species Act

Photo Source: 1SEO Digital Agency (CC BY-NC 4.0)

A lawsuit filed by the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and Property and Environment Research Center seeks to remove safeguards for species listed as "threatened" under federal law

Photo Source: David (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The contested "blanket rule" automatically extends protections to threatened species without requiring individual protection plans for each animal or plant

Photo Source: USFWS Endangered Species (CC BY 2.0)

Trump's administration previously scrapped this protective measure in 2019, forcing wildlife officials to create separate rules for nearly 100 threatened species

Photo Source: Gage Skidmore (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Biden reinstated the blanket protection in 2024, but the legal challenge now threatens to reverse these safeguards under the second Trump administration

Photo Source: Gage Skidmore (CC BY-SA 2.0)

This cynical court challenge has nothing to do with conservation and everything to do with stripping protections from vulnerable wildlife," warns Noah Greenwald from the Center

Photo Source: USFWS Endangered Species (CC BY 2.0)

Wildlife advocates fear that without the blanket rule, species like Florida scrub jays and marbled murrelets could face increased extinction risks amid staffing and funding cuts

Photo Source: Florida Fish and Wildlife (CC BY-ND 2.0)

When the blanket rule was previously removed, some threatened species received significantly weaker protections through their individual rules

Photo Source: Marie Hale (CC BY 2.0)

The case unfolds against the backdrop of what scientists describe as a global extinction crisis threatening over a million species in coming decades

Photo Source: United Nations Photo (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)