NASA's 'Arsenic Life' Study Nears Retraction

Karmactive Staff

In 2010, NASA’s announcement about arsenic-based life sparked global excitement.

Photo Source: Robert M. Lavinsky (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Researcher Felisa Wolfe-Simon claimed the bacterium GFAJ-1 could use arsenic instead of phosphorus.

Photo Source: NASA HQ Photo (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The discovery, from Mono Lake, could have reshaped biology and astrobiology.

Photo Source: Dicklyon (CC BY 4.0)

Scientists quickly challenged the findings, citing contamination and DNA stability issues.

Photo Source: The Digital Artist (PDM 1.0)

A team later confirmed no detectable arsenic in the bacterium’s DNA.

Photo Source: Itoldya test 1 (CCO 1.0)

The debate unfolded rapidly on social media under #arseniclife, changing how science is discussed.

Photo Source: Stock vault (CC0 1.0)

Science's editor admitted the original peer reviewers lacked biochemical expertise.

Photo Source: Dolphin (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The controversy led major journals to strengthen their review processes.

Photo Source: Nick Youngson (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Despite the retraction, Wolfe-Simon continues research with NASA funding.

Photo Source: FitzFox (PDM 1.0)

The case highlights the power of social media in scientific discourse and remains a landmark example of how digital platforms reshape peer review.

Photo Source: Pickpik (PDM 1.0)